Training Valve and Control Engineers
When there’s a boom in a sector, there normally follows that there’ll be a wide demand for skilled technicians and workers. If the demand can’t be satisfied locally, the staff comes from other states or industries to fill the gap. If the demand epically high, the novel recruits are found and completely trained and they scale escalate. The present boost in the commodities like unconventional oil and gas has resulted in a high demand of for valve and control engineers in areas such as US, Canada, and Australia.
Furthermore, nearly all the sectors are experiencing advances in tech. In our own actuator and valve field, we’ve seen a boost in sophistication in automation and control. For instance, the use of a microprocessor in the valve actuators is today commonplace. KP-LOK
This creates the maintenance and upkeep of site tools even more demanding jobs for new training valve and Control Engineers. The technical part of automatic valve shape might be fairly stable in terms of tech, but the valve actuators have forever been challenges tools to be controlled. During my times an apprentice in energy plant, no one wants to work on the MOVs and my senior controllers were designated to work on the power actuators on the system.
For old generations when technicians failed to control, the initial thing to do was the take it apart to see what was incorrect. But that was before valve actuators were smart. Now almost every tool has designed to point where the diagnostic procedure can’t be completed by objective disassembly. The tools now require linking to diagnostic equipment or interrogating applying a built Human Machine interferes to determine where an issue might lie. This is just because the issue could be a faulty or tool problem and graphical inspection reveals a bit.
No More Diagnosis by Dismantling
In fact, dismantle by the untrained workers or controllers invariably exacerbate an issue. I’ve seen valve actuators disassembled and adjusted with iron rods welded onto output shafts to attempt to boost seating force when a simple modifying of the torque switches would have solved the issue.
Noninvasive diagnostics are fine if the controller is well known with the tool, but with the range of tools and developers in the sector now, it is near possible to be a specialized, or even well know with, control and diagnosis of each tool. Sometimes, there’s just too much info.
Imagine the condition of valve controller sent to troubleshoot issues at a remote site. There might be 3-4 brands of instrumentation & control tool on site and a range of tools for each brand. Well, trained and experience valve and controller engineers might be prepared with tools and documentation to allow a liable option of resolving issues. Though, fresh hires might find they’re sticking a 5-hour drive from the base with important tool or item of info mission.
A lot of developers have recognized this and have well-equipped training skills to provide comprehensive training to the trainer of their tool. Though, this kind of training takes a commitment in money and time for both sides. Users have to take workers away from their jobs for many days. Would they do, if they just have some pieces of developer’s equipment?